Comments on: a brief look at DotNetEngine vs XEngine http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/ ...you are in a grid of twisty, little links, all alike. there's a teleport gate here. Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:10:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Sean’s Mental Walkabout » Blog Archive » Links for November 7th http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/comment-page-1/#comment-256 Sean’s Mental Walkabout » Blog Archive » Links for November 7th Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:01:33 +0000 http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/?p=175#comment-256 <p>[...] xyzzy xyzzy… » a brief look at DotNetEngine vs XEngineIt's really nice to see the stats work helping people figure out where some of our bottlenecks are. It isn't perfect, but it is definitely going in the right direction. [...]</p> [...] xyzzy xyzzy… » a brief look at DotNetEngine vs XEngineIt's really nice to see the stats work helping people figure out where some of our bottlenecks are. It isn't perfect, but it is definitely going in the right direction. [...]

]]> By: DrScofield http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/comment-page-1/#comment-255 DrScofield Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:09:02 +0000 http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/?p=175#comment-255 <p>@sean: interesting. i hadn't really thought about that and assumed it was "translating" CPU load average into percentages, somehow.</p> @sean: interesting. i hadn’t really thought about that and assumed it was “translating” CPU load average into percentages, somehow.

]]> By: Sean Dague http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Sean Dague Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:57:40 +0000 http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/?p=175#comment-254 <p>I don't think the percentage calculation is working right, as there is no way that it should be able to get above 100% by the way I'm doing the math. That said, the relative numbers are comparable, and there is a 10x difference there.</p> I don’t think the percentage calculation is working right, as there is no way that it should be able to get above 100% by the way I’m doing the math. That said, the relative numbers are comparable, and there is a 10x difference there.

]]> By: G2 Proto/Kyle G http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/comment-page-1/#comment-253 G2 Proto/Kyle G Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:57:28 +0000 http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/?p=175#comment-253 <p>Great comparison thanks for sharing!</p> Great comparison thanks for sharing!

]]> By: Kai Ludwig http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2008/11/07/a-brief-look-at-dotnetengine-vs-xengine/comment-page-1/#comment-252 Kai Ludwig Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:40:05 +0000 http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/?p=175#comment-252 <p>Our scripts run fine on XEngine but also suffer from serious startup problems. We solved the issue by setting up a listener in all scripts that executes a ScriptReset command when receiving a special code from sayRegion on a dedicated channel.</p> <p>This way we just have to manually give a single region script reset command after startup and all scripts reset automatically. Due to the low number of affected regions our administrator is capable of doing this by hand after a region restart.</p> <p>Greetings from the real world, Kai Ludwig Director TalentRaspel virtual worlds Ltd. www.talentraspel.de</p> Our scripts run fine on XEngine but also suffer from serious startup problems. We solved the issue by setting up a listener in all scripts that executes a ScriptReset command when receiving a special code from sayRegion on a dedicated channel.

This way we just have to manually give a single region script reset command after startup and all scripts reset automatically. Due to the low number of affected regions our administrator is capable of doing this by hand after a region restart.

Greetings from the real world, Kai Ludwig Director TalentRaspel virtual worlds Ltd. http://www.talentraspel.de

]]>