<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: retiring perl after almost 20 years&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/</link>
	<description>...you are in a grid of twisty, little links, all alike. there's a teleport gate here.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DrScofield</title>
		<link>http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>DrScofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thx for the Net::XMMP2 hint! i'll take another look at it, would be nice to keep the perl API as well :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;re threads: yes, i can see that point. it would be nice though to be able to share stuff like IO handles and the like, not just simple variables or refs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;anyhow, thx for sharing!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for the Net::XMMP2 hint! i&#8217;ll take another look at it, would be nice to keep the perl API as well <img src='http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>re threads: yes, i can see that point. it would be nice though to be able to share stuff like IO handles and the like, not just simple variables or refs.</p>

<p>anyhow, thx for sharing!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Melo</title>
		<link>http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Melo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2007/11/23/retiring-perl-after-almost-20-years/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Net::XMPP is a bit on the dead side. You should look at Net::XMPP2, actively developed and much cleaner API.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding threads, and the not-shared by default, it really depends on what you like or need or are accustom to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I tend to have less bugs when threads don't share by default and it makes me clearly define the points where two or more threads exchange information. It makes my code cleaner, and I think more robust.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>

<p>Net::XMPP is a bit on the dead side. You should look at Net::XMPP2, actively developed and much cleaner API.</p>

<p>Regarding threads, and the not-shared by default, it really depends on what you like or need or are accustom to.</p>

<p>I tend to have less bugs when threads don&#8217;t share by default and it makes me clearly define the points where two or more threads exchange information. It makes my code cleaner, and I think more robust.</p>

<p>Best regards,</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
